Other1 min read

Texas woman wins $100,000 legal fees over HOA ban on 160 sq ft backyard office

By · Via Times of India · Published by Everything Blog

In short

The dispute originated in 2020 when Masha Davis sought approval to add the accessory space within the Davis Spring subdivision, only to be rejected by the Architectural Review Committee for allegedly exceeding roofline height limits. Davis sued the Davis Spring Property Owners’ Association and board president Amanda Mock, ultimately proving that the community's recorded 2002 Design Guidelines contained no such restrictions. Although her claims regarding fiduciary breach and fair housing violations were dismissed, she prevailed on the restrictive covenants claim. The appellate court affirmed the decision on September 29, 2026, ordering the association to cover the granted legal costs.

Key points

  • Homeowners' associations cannot restrict property additions without explicit backing from…: Homeowners' associations cannot restrict property additions without explicit backing from their recorded design guidelines.
  • The Texas Third Court of Appeals rejected the property association's arguments challengin…: The Texas Third Court of Appeals rejected the property association's arguments challenging the statutory fee entitlement.
  • Lawsuits against overreaching property covenants can result in substantial monetary award…: Lawsuits against overreaching property covenants can result in substantial monetary awards against neighborhood governing boards.

Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1

In a Texas case, a homeowner challenged an association’s rejection of her proposed backyard office on the ground of an alleged height violation. Six years after the application was rejected, the Texas Third Court of Appeals awarded her $100,000 in attorney fees, leaving the homeowners’ association with the heavy legal tab.

Backyard project faces opposition

The dispute began in 2020 when Masha Davis, a resident of the Davis Spring subdivision in Williamson County, Texas, applied to build an accessory structure in her backyard. Davis described the proposed addition as a home office, while the homeowners’ association described it as a shed or shed-like structure in court proceedings.

The Texas Third Court of Appeals said the association’s Architectural Review Committee denied the application, finding the proposed building exceeded the height allowed and rose above the roofline.

Davis appealed, arguing that the recorded declaration of the community and its enforceable design guidelines did not include a height restriction that would prohibit her proposed structure. She sued Davis Spring Property Owners’ Association and its board president, Amanda Mock.

Court finds no applicable height…

Other