The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the Trump administration's emergency petition for the second time in under a week. Judges Mark Bennett and Gabriel Sanchez formed the majority, arguing the federal demand was unconstitutional, while Judge Patrick Bumatay dissented. The dispute emerged after the administration sued the state on October 15 over approximately 20,000 flagged mail-in ballots. Similar government lists sent to Nevada and Washington have faced pushback from officials citing widespread inaccuracies.
Key points
California officials successfully defended against federal demands to isolate twenty thou…: California officials successfully defended against federal demands to isolate twenty thousand mail-in ballots ahead of the election.
The court determined the administration failed to provide adequate proof to justify segre…: The court determined the administration failed to provide adequate proof to justify segregating ballots before the upcoming vote.
State leadership maintains the federal lawsuits represent an effort to suppress voters an…: State leadership maintains the federal lawsuits represent an effort to suppress voters and damage public trust in election outcomes.
Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1
The 9th Circuit Court called the petition to remove 20,000 ballots from California’s vote count unconstitutional.
For the second time in less than a week, an appeals court in the United States has rejected a petition from the administration of President Donald Trump to set aside 20,000 ballots in California over concerns about non-citizen voting.
The decision arrived on Friday, with less than four days to go until the November 3 midterm elections.
Recommended Stories
list of 3 items- list 1 of 3Judge rejects Trump effort to block California ‘noncitizen’ ballots
- list 2 of 3Trump administration renews bid to block Alaska election results
- list 3 of 3What to know about California’s midterm elections
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Trump’s request would not only violate the US Constitution but also risk disenfranchising eligible voters.
“The consequence of the United States’s request is not merely ballot segregation, but ultimately both the cancellation of the ballot and the removal of voters from the voting rolls,” the majority wrote in its ruling.
The multi-billion-dollar transaction relies entirely on external funding from European and Canadian partners to bolster Kyiv's air defense capabilities ahead of anticipated winter bombardments. However, severe manufacturing bottlenecks mean Ukraine will not receive the munitions immediately to counter current Russian strikes on critical energy infrastructure. The green light also follows rising political tension between Washington and Kyiv over the conflict's direction.
Tehran's armed forces have finalized preparations for an aggressive military retaliation should the country face further foreign aggression. An unnamed security and political official warned that adversaries and their regional partners will face unexpected levels of intensity and reach. Concurrently, domestic political figures are pursuing significant policy shifts that could fundamentally alter the nation's international nuclear commitments.
Law enforcement authorities have significantly escalated their presence in the state following reports connecting Mary Peltola's campaign to the recruitment of Dan J. Sullivan. The inquiry addresses concerns that the duplicate name was intentionally deployed to mislead voters and disrupt the Senate race against the Republican incumbent. Investigators are actively assessing the election's integrity while balancing competing claims over ballot administration.