Politics1 min read

Prediction market bettors are the new political pundits. Why are we listening to them? | Judith Levine

By · Via The Guardian Business · Published by Everything Blog

In short

Rather than reflecting the broad wisdom of the crowd, prediction market performance is heavily concentrated among an elite minority of participants. Research shows that casual users perform no better than chance, leaving substantial trading profits in the hands of specialized firms using high-speed algorithms. Furthermore, costly professional data feeds that can run up to $200,000 annually give these operations an insurmountable edge over ordinary citizens. As a result, market swings increasingly distort public expectations about political races without mirroring true changes in voter preferences.

Key points

  • Political wagering platforms are controlled by high-frequency institutional traders rathe…: Political wagering platforms are controlled by high-frequency institutional traders rather than everyday participants.
  • Ordinary market participants routinely lose money while generating passive trading volume…: Ordinary market participants routinely lose money while generating passive trading volume for an elite few.
  • Capital-driven shifts in contract prices can actively distort voter expectations without…: Capital-driven shifts in contract prices can actively distort voter expectations without any genuine change in polling sentiment.

Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1

Online betting is a bit like Donald Trump.

The prediction markets – platforms where users bet on whether events will occur – pretend to be populist, pushing the nabobs aside and representing the “wisdom of the crowd”. “This data is bottom-up, not elites-driven,” a Kalshi spokesperson told Reuters. But in fact, the markets are controlled by a few, skillful traders.

Their users are led to believe they can strike it rich. But like gamblers everywhere, most of them lose most of the time, while enriching the casino and bankrolling the winner’s takings.

The markets pretend honesty and transparency, but they open the door to fraud and insider trading.

Like opinion polls, they affect voters’ expectations of the outcomes of elections but make them no smarter about whom to vote for.

Fundamentally, the assumptions projected by the prediction markets are Trumpian. The companies suggest that their results are improved by the financial stake customers have in them.

“Prediction markets are a way to see what people are saying when there’s money on the line,” said the Kalshi spokesperson. When money talks,…

Politics