Artificial Intelligence1 min read

More than half of Victorian lawyers use AI – but only a quarter have cut client fees as a result

By · Via The Guardian · Published by Everything Blog

In short

A census of over 2,200 practitioners revealed that while adoption surged to 55 percent, fee relief has primarily favored corporate accounts over ordinary individuals. The anticipated efficiency gains are frequently compromised because lawyers must constantly audit client-provided artificial intelligence research alongside their own work. The Federal Court and state regulators have introduced stricter oversight following disciplinary actions against local practitioners for submitting false automated citations.

Key points

  • Anticipated efficiency savings for clients remain largely unrealized as only 26 percent o…: Anticipated efficiency savings for clients remain largely unrealized as only 26 percent of practitioners have lowered their fees.
  • Independent use of generative chatbots by clients creates additional workloads by introdu…: Independent use of generative chatbots by clients creates additional workloads by introducing errors that require formal legal correction.
  • Australian courts are aggressively tightening rules after fabricated citations resulted i…: Australian courts are aggressively tightening rules after fabricated citations resulted in practitioner sanctions and official warnings from judicial leadership.

Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1

More than half of Victoria’s lawyers have reported using AI in their work, according to a new study, but just over a quarter say they’ve reduced fees as a result of efficiency gains.

They also say clients seeking advice from chatbots has added to their workload, forcing them to correct errors made by AI.

The 2026 census of 2,221 of the state’s lawyers, conducted by the Victorian Legal Services Board and Commissioner’s legal services research centre, found a major increase in lawyers using AI in their practices, rising from 37% to 55% in the last year.

While the 2025 report found AI use was highest among those under 30 years of age, in 2026 this disparity had largely disappeared, although usage remained low for those aged 60 and over.

AI use was most common in trade practices (85%), banking and finance (78%) and information technology and telecommunications (78%), while it was used much less in criminal law (29%), family law (45%) and administrative law (46%).

While there are AI tools designed specifically for legal services, 79% of lawyers reported using…

Artificial Intelligence