Other1 min read

Married sisters win share in father’s properties

By · Published by Everything Blog

In short

The legal battle began following the death of Shivappa, whose daughters demanded their rightful shares in government-granted tenancy plots. Their brothers, Basavaraj and Mahadevappa, contested the action by arguing the Land Tribunal grants were not ancestral assets and citing an alleged relinquishment deed. However, the High Court rejected these arguments because the brothers failed to demonstrate the parcel ceased being joint family property. Upholding the trial court's original decision, the bench officially awarded each daughter a 1/7th share of the estate.

Key points

  • Married Hindu daughters maintain legal rights to inherit shares of state-granted land giv…: Married Hindu daughters maintain legal rights to inherit shares of state-granted land given to their fathers.
  • Opposing parties must legally substantiate claims that granted land ceases to be classifi…: Opposing parties must legally substantiate claims that granted land ceases to be classified as joint family property.
  • The High Court formally dismissed the brothers' second appeal to enforce established judi…: The High Court formally dismissed the brothers' second appeal to enforce established judicial precedents on female inheritance.

Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1

The Karnataka High Court has ruled in favour of two married sisters by rejecting their brothers’ claim that government granted land can’t be shared with them. The Karnataka High Court decided that Hindu Succession Act takes priority over the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, allowing married Hindu daughters to get a share of their father’s land that was granted to him by the state under the Karnataka Land Reforms Act.

Also read: Grandson got 3.11 bigha of Delhi land and other properties via Will, family members objected to this; HC grants probate of Will to grandson, know why

Trouble started when Shivappa’s two married daughters asked for a 1/5th share of each piece of land their father received from the government. Basavaraj and Mahadevappa didn’t want to give any piece of land to their married sisters, causing the dispute to reach the court.

Also read: Father bought 5-bigha land in elder brother’s name, other brothers claimed it was joint family land; M.P. High Court rules in elder brother’s favour, here's why

Basavaraj and Mahadevappa submitted arguments to the court arguing that…

Other