Other1 min read

Florida wedding venue's gunfire and chainsaw ban against neighbours overturned

By · Via Times of India · Published by Everything Blog

In short

The dispute originated when venue operators Clark and Amy Frogley filed suit accusing adjacent property owners of coordinating disruptions, including airboat engines and gunfire, during planned ceremonies. While a trial court originally issued an order requiring neighbours to curb their noise upon 24 hours of advance notice, the Sixth District Court of Appeal vacated the command. The appellate panel found that despite evidence of a harmful nuisance, the mansion owners failed to present any proof of lost bookings or cancelled events. Without documentation proving that potential business harm could not be remedied through monetary compensation, the emergency order could not legally stand.

Key points

  • Emergency temporary injunctions require strict proof of irreparable harm that cannot be f…: Emergency temporary injunctions require strict proof of irreparable harm that cannot be fixed with monetary compensation.
  • Sydonie Mansion failed to document lost bookings, cancelled weddings, or imminent financi…: Sydonie Mansion failed to document lost bookings, cancelled weddings, or imminent financial ruin to support emergency relief.
  • The appellate ruling determined that evidence of a harmful nuisance alone is insufficient…: The appellate ruling determined that evidence of a harmful nuisance alone is insufficient to justify a temporary injunction.

Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1

A wedding ceremony is supposed to be a peaceful celebration, but a Florida wedding venue found itself dealing with a very different kind of disturbance. Its owners accused their neighbours of repeatedly disrupting ceremonies with loud gunfire, revving chainsaw and airboat engines, loud music and roaming dogs. The alleged disturbances became the subject of a legal dispute after the venue claimed that the behaviour was interfering with its business and threatening its future.

The Florida Sixth District Court of Appeal addressed the dispute in its October 30, 2026, decision in Brad Hatcher and Audrey Hatcher v. Restorical, LLC, doing business as Sydonie Mansion. The

ruling, available on Justia, overturned a temporary injunction that had restricted the neighbours' conduct during weddings and other events. The appeals court found that although there was evidence supporting a harmful nuisance claim, the venue had not sufficiently demonstrated that it would suffer irreparable harm without the restrictions.

Dispute over wedding ceremonies at historic Florida mansion

The case involved Sydonie Mansion, a historic property in Mount Dora, Florida, owned by Restorical LLC. The venue's owners, Clark…

Other