NHL trade rumors around Dylan Larkin have reached a potentially important stretch, with a prediction pointing to late October as a possible window for a deal. Detroit has reportedly explored young centers around the league, while Larkin has widened the list of teams he would consider joining. Those developments have added urgency to a story that has lingered for months, but they are not proof that a trade is close. The Red Wings still need an offer that meets their expectations, and Larkin must approve any destination because of his full no-trade clause.
NHL trade rumors put Dylan Larkin in focus
On October 16, analyst John Buccigross said on Frankly Hockey that he expected a Detroit trade within seven to 10 days. When Frank Seravalli asked if he meant Larkin rather than defenseman Simon Edvinsson, Buccigross confirmed Larkin was the player he had in mind. That forecast placed the possible window around October 23-26.
On October 22, NHL insider Elliotte Friedman reported that the Red Wings had asked other teams about young centers, including prospects who have yet to play in the NHL. Friedman could not confirm whether those conversations involved Larkin, Edvinsson or both. The discussions point to broader roster planning, not a confirmed trade plan.
Larkin has also reportedly expanded his list of acceptable destinations from three teams to 10.
The clubs named in reports include Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, Dallas, Washington, Carolina, Tampa Bay, Florida, Vegas and Utah. A longer list could give Detroit more room to negotiate, though Larkin would still have to approve the team involved.
Detroit’s asking price could decide the outcome
The bigger obstacle may be what the Red Wings want in return. TSN’s Darren Dreger has reported that Detroit is seeking two high-end prospects, a top-nine NHL forward and a first-round pick. That is a steep package, even for a proven center who could strengthen a contender.
Some possible destinations may struggle to meet that price. Colorado has been linked as a fit but faces questions over available assets and salary-cap space. New Jersey’s situation may have shifted after its reported Connor Hellebuyck trade, while Minnesota could have a limited offer to put together. These are potential complications, not signs that talks with any one club are close.
Detroit has good reason not to move Larkin for a disappointing return. He is a top-line center, and accepting less than the club believes he is worth would weaken its position. But a high asking price can also narrow the market if interested teams cannot assemble the right mix of players and picks.
The late-October prediction may prove accurate, but it is still a forecast. If those days pass without a deal, that would not automatically mean negotiations have collapsed. The key question is whether Detroit can find a return it likes and a destination Larkin will accept. Until both conditions are met, trade talk remains just that.