Rouse Avenue judicial authorities expressed strong displeasure after police could not confirm if witness testimony would proceed as scheduled in the multi-crore investigation involving Sukesh Chandrasekhar. Legal representatives sought relief from the personal appearance mandate, prompting strict warnings about witness obligations before the bench. The actor is now formally directed to present her evidence before the bench early next month. Delhi Police had informed the court that despite previous summons, officials lacked any clarity on whether Fatehi planned to appear.
Key points
The court rejected an exemption application submitted by Fatehi's counsel regarding her m…: The court rejected an exemption application submitted by Fatehi's counsel regarding her mandatory appearance.
Judicial authorities reprimanded the defense counsel and cautioned the witness against ta…: Judicial authorities reprimanded the defense counsel and cautioned the witness against taking the court for granted.
The actor is legally expected to present and record her witness evidence at the scheduled…: The actor is legally expected to present and record her witness evidence at the scheduled hearing.
Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1
NEW DELHI: Delhi Rouse Avenue court on Monday issued fresh summons to actor
Nora Fatehi, directing her to appear on November 6 to record her evidence in the Rs 200-crore extortion case linked to conman Sukesh Chandrasekhar.
The development came after
Delhi Police informed the court that Fatehi had been summoned but it had no information on whether she would appear.
Fatehi's counsel moved an application seeking exemption from her appearance.
The court, however, pulled up her counsel, observing that she was a witness and was expected to be present.
"She is a witness and was supposed to be here. Her conduct is not up to the mark. Don't take the court for granted," the court said while issuing fresh summons.
Following confirmation from the Uttar Pradesh government, the Supreme Court has cleared the way for a local Ayodhya court to conduct the trial into misappropriated temple funds. Investigators revealed that the financial misconduct occurred while offerings were being counted, with suspects channeling the stolen capital into real estate and private bank accounts. The top court formally disposed of the matter without making any determinations on the case's merits.
State broadcasters opted to pull the Spanish club's latest match from public airwaves and digital platforms following Kylian Mbappe's remarks regarding former leader Mao Zedong. The move underscores persistent tensions between Western sports entities and Beijing's strict political sensitivities. Despite formal apologies from the player and league officials, commercial repercussions continue to mount as local brands sever ties.
Investigators have uncovered an expansive multi-state network that preyed on female donors with targeted financial incentives. Official documentation names specific facilitators who coordinated the illicit transactions across regional borders. The ongoing inquiry focuses on mapping the full extent of this illicit medical ring.