The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement has celebrated the withdrawal of a second global energy corporation from an offshore gas initiative situated near Gaza. This corporate retreat has intensified ongoing debates regarding the rightful ownership and authority over maritime gas fields claimed by Palestinians. According to reporting by Al Jazeera's Mikail Malik, campaigners continue to actively challenge commercial operations linked to these contested natural resources.
Key points
Multinational energy firms are facing intensified pressure from activists over projects i…: Multinational energy firms are facing intensified pressure from activists over projects in disputed Palestinian waters.
The recent corporate departures have revived scrutiny surrounding ownership rights over n…: The recent corporate departures have revived scrutiny surrounding ownership rights over natural gas reserves near Gaza.
Campaigners intend to maintain active challenges against foreign corporate involvement in…: Campaigners intend to maintain active challenges against foreign corporate involvement in Israeli-led maritime extraction ventures.
Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1
NewsFeed
BDS claims win as energy giants quit Israeli gas project off Gaza
The Boycott, Divest and Sanctions movement is claiming victory after a second international company exited an Israeli-led gas project off Gaza. But who controls the gas reserves in waters claimed by Palestinians? Al Jazeera’s Mikail Malik spoke to campaigners.
The cross-border strike targets critical energy infrastructure designed to bypass potential maritime chokepoints in the Persian Gulf. By striking deep within the kingdom's territory, the operation signals a severe escalation in regional hostilities and elevates security risks for Middle Eastern crude transit.
During discussions with American envoys Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, the Kremlin reiterated its insistence on retaining full control over four claimed Ukrainian regions while dismissing proposed international peacekeepers. This uncompromising position complicates Western mediation efforts and undermines hopes for a swift diplomatic resolution before 2026.
Diplomatic efforts in The Hague follow mounting pressure from Washington, which sanctioned the tribunal after it issued arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials over alleged war crimes in Gaza. The reported negotiations aim to restrict the court's jurisdiction over non-member state nationals and grant immunity to world leaders. Altering these founding rules would require extensive approval from member states, risking the legal integrity of the international justice system.