Politics2 min read

CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka move Delhi HC; cases handed to Crime Branch

By · Via Times of India · Published by Everything Blog

In short

Two CJP officials, Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, challenged their judicial custody in the Delhi High Court, facing transfer to the Crime Branch. The court is closed for Dussehra, and their petition will be redundant if released on Wednesday. They have submitted sureties multiple times but the mandatory procedure was not followed, leading to a delay in accepting the sureties. The plea argues for a "proximate and real nexus" with public order, not a remote possibility, challenging the issue of protest at a denotified site.

Key points

  • The plea argues for a "proximate and real nexus" with public order.: The plea argues for a "proximate and real nexus" with public order.
  • The issue of protest at a denotified site is a question of regulation, not a threat to pu…: The issue of protest at a denotified site is a question of regulation, not a threat to public order.
  • The court is closed for Dussehra, making their petition redundant if released on Wednesda…: The court is closed for Dussehra, making their petition redundant if released on Wednesday.

Sources checked by our analysis pipeline: 1

NEW DELHI:

CJP's Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka Tuesday approached Delhi HC challenging their judicial custody, a day before the special executive magistrate decides whether to extend their custody.

The two were detained on Oct 13 after they climbed a gate to enter Jantar Mantar, which has been denotified as a protest site, to protest against SIR. They have since spent 7 days in custody - initial five days, followed by a two-day extension that expires on Wednesday. Meanwhile, police have transferred the Oct 13 cases against them to Crime Branch.

Das and Ranka have sought an urgent hearing, but the court is closed for Dussehra. If the executive magistrate releases them Wednesday, their petition will become redundant.

However, until late Tuesday, the court’s cause list didn’t have any case listed for hearing this week. However, sources said a call will be taken Wednesday if urgent listing has to be permitted and a vacation bench assembled for the same.

In their petition, the two said their two-day remand violated the legal procedure and their ‘Right to Liberty’ under Article 21 of the Constitution.

They continue to remain in custody for six days despite submitting the required sureties multiple times, it said.

“The mandatory procedure under Section 140 BNSS was not followed for rejecting the surety, showing complete misapplication of the law in the impugned order. That delay and obstruction in the acceptance and verification of sureties frustrates the very purpose of release,” the plea said.

The plea further argues that restricting the petitioners’ liberty in the interest of public order requires a “proximate and real nexus with disturbance of public order” and not a remote possibility, pointing out that the issue of protest at a denotified site is, at its highest, a question of regulation, not a threat to public order.

Original source: timesofindia.indiatimes.com

Politics